Staci in MO
03-06-2009, 02:04 PM
I'll be starting Algebra with my ds next year. We've been using Life of Fred Fractions and Decimals, and it seems to be doing the job, so we're going to stick with it.
But, I'm a little nervous about using something so out of the box for algebra, so I'm thinking of getting a "real" algebra book, just so I can hold them side by side to be sure we're not missing anything, and occasionally pull it out for extra practice.
I like the sound of Dolciani (and I used the newer Dolciani in high school in the 80s), but I don't want to go through that kind of effort for a back-up program. I've narrowed it down to Jacobs and Foerster.
Anyway, my ds is very bright, but very right-brained. He does great at math when he can see the big picture or the reason behind it (hence the reason LOF is such a hit). He's also slightly dyslexic. The result is a kid who can do amazing feats of mental gymnastics to come up with the correct answer in his head, but on the next problem will foul up something simple because he transposed numbers, got the fraction upside down, etc.
I've heard that Jacobs is more "wordy", which he would like. But it sounds like Foerster might have more real-world application.
Does anyone have experience with both? Thanks.
But, I'm a little nervous about using something so out of the box for algebra, so I'm thinking of getting a "real" algebra book, just so I can hold them side by side to be sure we're not missing anything, and occasionally pull it out for extra practice.
I like the sound of Dolciani (and I used the newer Dolciani in high school in the 80s), but I don't want to go through that kind of effort for a back-up program. I've narrowed it down to Jacobs and Foerster.
Anyway, my ds is very bright, but very right-brained. He does great at math when he can see the big picture or the reason behind it (hence the reason LOF is such a hit). He's also slightly dyslexic. The result is a kid who can do amazing feats of mental gymnastics to come up with the correct answer in his head, but on the next problem will foul up something simple because he transposed numbers, got the fraction upside down, etc.
I've heard that Jacobs is more "wordy", which he would like. But it sounds like Foerster might have more real-world application.
Does anyone have experience with both? Thanks.