Cadam
02-11-2008, 12:30 PM
I was just randomly reading reviews for some curriculum I already own and use. A great deal of the time I was left wondering if the people doing the reviews looked at, or even read the description, of a product before they purchased it.
It was just so clear that many times people did not understand how a program was suppose to work or the basic educational philosophy of the author. It was really frustrating to see people criticize a classical curriculum basically for being classical. If you don't want, or understand why someone would use, copy-work or narration then maybe you shouldn't choose FLL for your kids! If you want a spiral math program - don't pick MUS. :cool:
I have purchased a few things that really didn't work for my kids but I realized it was not a flaw in the program but in my choice. Also some people basically just write that they either loved or hated a program with no reasoning. That's not very helpful. I had hoped that site would be actually helpful, bummer.
It was just so clear that many times people did not understand how a program was suppose to work or the basic educational philosophy of the author. It was really frustrating to see people criticize a classical curriculum basically for being classical. If you don't want, or understand why someone would use, copy-work or narration then maybe you shouldn't choose FLL for your kids! If you want a spiral math program - don't pick MUS. :cool:
I have purchased a few things that really didn't work for my kids but I realized it was not a flaw in the program but in my choice. Also some people basically just write that they either loved or hated a program with no reasoning. That's not very helpful. I had hoped that site would be actually helpful, bummer.