Scuff
09-26-2008, 12:20 PM
I just typed up a big long post and then the server was too busy and it's gone :( Grrr. So, the short version.
You all were so helpful in my reading thread. Here's a similar question for DS. The gist of it: Math is his strength, but he's a little behind where he could be potentially, because I've switched him so many times. Last year, for 2nd, we did R&S, which moved too slow. But I was reluctant to change, since I already had so many times. So we stuck it out the whole year. Now we're switching to MUS with Singapore CWP/IP as desired. The past 3 weeks he's been moving through Beta (since it goes so much more in depth than R&S, I didn't want to just skip it). He watches the video and does the test. He understands the concepts, but has been getting about half the big problems wrong. I can tell he understands, because he does the problem correctly, he just gets computation errors which then make the whole problem wrong. (BTW, this is big add/sub problems. 4 thousand #s together)
So, my question is, how much of this has to actually be *right* before we consider him as having mastery? Can he just have mastery now, even though he's getting half of them wrong? How much should he have right before he's practiced enough? My first inclination is to just let him move on to Gamma next week and then print up a few problems for review every once in awhile. He's enjoying math again for the first time since we started R&S, so I don't want to ruin that. But he does need ot take care in his work, too. He's just too much in a hurry to finish the test and watch the next video that he's making a lot of mistakes. Also, is a 3 week stint in Beta enough to cement it, or should he have more practice?
ETA: Also, He doesn't want to show his work, especially with story problems. I understand. I *hated* showing my work when i was young. Seemed like a waste of time and a waste of writing effort. Another thread in the K-8 board said that this was important (which I do understand for higher maths). Do you all make them write out their work for every problem? Would it be ok to require it for a few, just so he can do it, but let him skip it on the rest?
You all were so helpful in my reading thread. Here's a similar question for DS. The gist of it: Math is his strength, but he's a little behind where he could be potentially, because I've switched him so many times. Last year, for 2nd, we did R&S, which moved too slow. But I was reluctant to change, since I already had so many times. So we stuck it out the whole year. Now we're switching to MUS with Singapore CWP/IP as desired. The past 3 weeks he's been moving through Beta (since it goes so much more in depth than R&S, I didn't want to just skip it). He watches the video and does the test. He understands the concepts, but has been getting about half the big problems wrong. I can tell he understands, because he does the problem correctly, he just gets computation errors which then make the whole problem wrong. (BTW, this is big add/sub problems. 4 thousand #s together)
So, my question is, how much of this has to actually be *right* before we consider him as having mastery? Can he just have mastery now, even though he's getting half of them wrong? How much should he have right before he's practiced enough? My first inclination is to just let him move on to Gamma next week and then print up a few problems for review every once in awhile. He's enjoying math again for the first time since we started R&S, so I don't want to ruin that. But he does need ot take care in his work, too. He's just too much in a hurry to finish the test and watch the next video that he's making a lot of mistakes. Also, is a 3 week stint in Beta enough to cement it, or should he have more practice?
ETA: Also, He doesn't want to show his work, especially with story problems. I understand. I *hated* showing my work when i was young. Seemed like a waste of time and a waste of writing effort. Another thread in the K-8 board said that this was important (which I do understand for higher maths). Do you all make them write out their work for every problem? Would it be ok to require it for a few, just so he can do it, but let him skip it on the rest?