Laurie4b
09-04-2009, 10:58 PM
I was all set to do AP World history. I had chosen the book, and was pleased with the way I thought it would go with other courses ds1 and ds 2 are taking: AP Comparative government, International studies (nonprofits), and Western Lit.
Then I ran into an acquaintance at church, who, it turns out, has taught AP history for a number of years. She suggested that I think about AP European history because at ds#1's first choice univ, they give 6 credits toward the history requirement for a 4 on European history and only 3 credits as an elective (not a requirement) for a 4 on World history. At ds#2's first choice, the courses are equal credit for equal scores. She thought that other than ancient history, I could work in a good bit of world history as Europeans had contact with other nations. She lent me several of her books, but I was disappointed at how little of other civilizations was covered in the texts.
Part of the issue is that I am personally averse to a purely Eurocentric approach to history.
I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons (ds's are fine either way):
Western Lit fits better with European history
I'm wondering which Comparative Govt fits better with. Anyone know?
In response to my angst, my friend at church suggested teaching world up to 1450, then switching to Euro. Do any of you think that is do-able?
Another thing I thought of (like a good/crazy homeschooler) was supplementing the Euro with stuff from World when we get to certain civilizations (like when England colonializes India, pause, and do a short tour through India's history) .
I would really welcome your experience, opinions, etc. I was aiming to start Tuesday, but now am spinning around in circles. (To complicate things, I found out that cc final exam week is concurrent with first week of AP exams. Will have to check with cc on Tuesday about whether they allow any flexibility in exam time. World doesn't conflict, but Euro does. So do two other exams for AP classes he's taking. Oh for the good old days of teaching them to read and do their times tables !)
Then I ran into an acquaintance at church, who, it turns out, has taught AP history for a number of years. She suggested that I think about AP European history because at ds#1's first choice univ, they give 6 credits toward the history requirement for a 4 on European history and only 3 credits as an elective (not a requirement) for a 4 on World history. At ds#2's first choice, the courses are equal credit for equal scores. She thought that other than ancient history, I could work in a good bit of world history as Europeans had contact with other nations. She lent me several of her books, but I was disappointed at how little of other civilizations was covered in the texts.
Part of the issue is that I am personally averse to a purely Eurocentric approach to history.
I'm trying to weigh the pros and cons (ds's are fine either way):
Western Lit fits better with European history
I'm wondering which Comparative Govt fits better with. Anyone know?
In response to my angst, my friend at church suggested teaching world up to 1450, then switching to Euro. Do any of you think that is do-able?
Another thing I thought of (like a good/crazy homeschooler) was supplementing the Euro with stuff from World when we get to certain civilizations (like when England colonializes India, pause, and do a short tour through India's history) .
I would really welcome your experience, opinions, etc. I was aiming to start Tuesday, but now am spinning around in circles. (To complicate things, I found out that cc final exam week is concurrent with first week of AP exams. Will have to check with cc on Tuesday about whether they allow any flexibility in exam time. World doesn't conflict, but Euro does. So do two other exams for AP classes he's taking. Oh for the good old days of teaching them to read and do their times tables !)