forty-two
06-17-2009, 10:16 PM
Ok, I kept telling myself I wasn't going to do this - ask whether my oldest was advanced - because I struggle with trying not to obsess over it. I'm gifted, my sister's gifted - smartest ones in our large suburban high school (which makes it ironic that I didn't even manage to graduate college, what with having a massive depression-induced meltdown and all :glare:), my parents are gifted, my dh is extremely bright. I've wanted to hs ever since I first heard about it (freshman year of college), largely because I was never challenged in school - wanted to keep my kids from wasting their time (not that I sat around bored or anything - I read 2-3 books a day from sixth grade on). Always kinda assumed my kids would be at least as bright as me - looked forward to it, really. I've never understood people not wanting their child to be gifted - especially people who are gifted themselves. I love what I can do - I can't imagine being any other way - and, like most parents, I want my kids to have the chance to share my (good) experiences.
But once I had R, I tried to stop the "of course she will be gifted" train of thought - didn't want to place any undue expectations on her, one way or another. "She is who she is, I love her no matter what - it doesn't matter whether she is gifted, so quit thinking about it." I'm mostly successful, but threads where someone's very young child blatantly shows off their giftedness would start me thinking in spite of myself that, "R doesn't do that - maybe she isn't <smack> - Don't go there....Well, I didn't do that either at that age, and I know I'm <smack> - What did I just say! Stop that!"
Then, of course, are the times when I see her do something, and I think, "What was I worried about! Of course she is <smack> - Quit that! Just enjoy the awesome thing she did without trying to turn it in to something bigger." And really, I could care less about the label - I just want her (and her sister) to be able to see the world like I do, like dh does, like my family does. Sure, we all see things differently, but in general things just make *sense*. But apparently it's not like that for most people (Or so people say. I'm not sure I actually believe it.). And it grieves me to think that my kids might never experience that - I literally cannot imagine what it would be like if my brain didn't work like it did - like losing a limb.
(Although I have no way of knowing how many other people's brains work like mine. I've been told not all that many, but everyone I know well is like me, so...who knows. I don't want to sound arrogant - for all know, I may be just like everyone else in how my brain works. Doesn't matter, I still am happy with it :). And want my kids to have at least as good a thinking experience as I have.)
So I avoided asking for outside assessment, as I wasn't sure on most things if it was truly advanced or just wishful thinking. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted to hear the answer. But a couple things really stand out to me - have for a long time - and I've decided it's time to make sure my "mommy scale" is properly calibrated with respect to reality. Either way, R is who she is, and can do what she can do, no matter how common or uncommon it may be.
And now, after five paragraphs of excessively angsty rambling - this is the first I've ever actually put all that in words, on (virtual) paper - rather cathartic actually (assuming I don't get lambasted either for being a horrible, pushy mother, or for arrogantly thinking I'm all that, of course) - on to the actual question at hand:
R just turned three. Two things I've noticed is that she seems to have a very good visual memory, and she is very good at making connections, especially with visual things. Some examples:
*Before she was two, she could remember where things were put after seeing it once. A noticeable incident was when we bought some oatmeal breakfast bars - not a regular event, and this was actually the first time. We kept them in a closed cabinet out of her reach and I got one out with her watching. The next day she wanted one, so she "asked" (delayed talker, didn't say more than three words till after her second birthday) by dragging me to the kitchen, pointing to the cabinet, and signing for food. She also recognized DVD cases and even the DVDs themselves - knew what movie they went with (and threw a royal fit if the DVD wasn't for the movie she wanted to watch!) - before she was two.
*She could identify all the letters in the alphabet, out of order, at 22 months; she couldn't say any of the names, but if I said, "Point to the F," she could do it. This took about 2-3 months, and was completely child-led; she kinda became obsessed with the alphabet at 20 months, and had me read her alphabet book repeatedly. She'd point to letters everywhere, and have me tell her what they were. She lost interest around 23 months, and picked it back it around 25-26 months, where she quickly learned to say all the names, and loved (still loves!) to point out letters everywhere. Knows both upper and lower case, and rarely has had trouble with different fonts. A couple months ago she was interested in learning the letter sounds, so I started teaching her the SWR phonograms, using her books. She has the one letter ones down cold, now. She picked up her numbers, 1-10, about the same time as her letters, and in the same way. She loves to count things, and is getting close to developing one-to-one correspondence.
*I bought Greek and Hebrew alphabet books in January, and kinda "strewed" them about. She latched on to the Greek one, and it was her favorite for about a month or so. Picked it back up in April/May, along with the Hebrew one, and she has the Greek alphabet, with their sounds, down cold. She's familiar with the Hebrew alphabet - she could name quite a few out of order in another context - but hasn't wanted to learn their sounds yet.
I have the impression this is somewhat early for alphabet learning, especially given that it was largely child-led; I occasionally would introduce new things, so she'd know they existed, but never pushed it or sat her down for lessons or anything. But it's not like it is cognitively hard, or anything - just needs a good memory, which she has in spades. I think her memory is better than average, but have nothing to compare it with.
*Connection-wise, the big thing I've noticed is she manages to correctly identify things unaided and unprompted - animals, usually - that she learned in a completely different setting. She connected live animals in movies (without them being named) - elephants, zebras, etc. - with the cartoon animals in a book (badly drawn ones, at that). She connected Shrek the ogre with the ogres in World of Warcraft (and was upset with dh for killing them!). She connected the donkey Mary rode with Donkey in Shrek. Plus tons of others. She did this as soon as she could talk (25 months - most of what I related happened around then, or within a few months), and I think even before that, via pointing, but I can't remember specific incidents there. It seems impressive to me, but again, nothing to compare it with. (Actually, it is impressive to me, period, even if it is perfectly normal. I love it when she makes connections!)
Overall, she has loved books since he was little - turned pages well, in a paper book, at 10 months. She will give me a stack of books and have me read through them all, sometimes repeatedly. From the beginning, R was very observant, very persistent, and had a good attention span; A, at 7mo, is equally observant and persistent, with just as good an attention span (so I don't know if it is just how babies are or what, but a lot of people have commented about the observation thing), but is more easy-going than R.
So, what sayeth the Hive? (Or, more accurately, what sayeth the few brave souls who actually made it through this monstrosity of a post :tongue_smilie:)
But once I had R, I tried to stop the "of course she will be gifted" train of thought - didn't want to place any undue expectations on her, one way or another. "She is who she is, I love her no matter what - it doesn't matter whether she is gifted, so quit thinking about it." I'm mostly successful, but threads where someone's very young child blatantly shows off their giftedness would start me thinking in spite of myself that, "R doesn't do that - maybe she isn't <smack> - Don't go there....Well, I didn't do that either at that age, and I know I'm <smack> - What did I just say! Stop that!"
Then, of course, are the times when I see her do something, and I think, "What was I worried about! Of course she is <smack> - Quit that! Just enjoy the awesome thing she did without trying to turn it in to something bigger." And really, I could care less about the label - I just want her (and her sister) to be able to see the world like I do, like dh does, like my family does. Sure, we all see things differently, but in general things just make *sense*. But apparently it's not like that for most people (Or so people say. I'm not sure I actually believe it.). And it grieves me to think that my kids might never experience that - I literally cannot imagine what it would be like if my brain didn't work like it did - like losing a limb.
(Although I have no way of knowing how many other people's brains work like mine. I've been told not all that many, but everyone I know well is like me, so...who knows. I don't want to sound arrogant - for all know, I may be just like everyone else in how my brain works. Doesn't matter, I still am happy with it :). And want my kids to have at least as good a thinking experience as I have.)
So I avoided asking for outside assessment, as I wasn't sure on most things if it was truly advanced or just wishful thinking. Also, I wasn't sure I wanted to hear the answer. But a couple things really stand out to me - have for a long time - and I've decided it's time to make sure my "mommy scale" is properly calibrated with respect to reality. Either way, R is who she is, and can do what she can do, no matter how common or uncommon it may be.
And now, after five paragraphs of excessively angsty rambling - this is the first I've ever actually put all that in words, on (virtual) paper - rather cathartic actually (assuming I don't get lambasted either for being a horrible, pushy mother, or for arrogantly thinking I'm all that, of course) - on to the actual question at hand:
R just turned three. Two things I've noticed is that she seems to have a very good visual memory, and she is very good at making connections, especially with visual things. Some examples:
*Before she was two, she could remember where things were put after seeing it once. A noticeable incident was when we bought some oatmeal breakfast bars - not a regular event, and this was actually the first time. We kept them in a closed cabinet out of her reach and I got one out with her watching. The next day she wanted one, so she "asked" (delayed talker, didn't say more than three words till after her second birthday) by dragging me to the kitchen, pointing to the cabinet, and signing for food. She also recognized DVD cases and even the DVDs themselves - knew what movie they went with (and threw a royal fit if the DVD wasn't for the movie she wanted to watch!) - before she was two.
*She could identify all the letters in the alphabet, out of order, at 22 months; she couldn't say any of the names, but if I said, "Point to the F," she could do it. This took about 2-3 months, and was completely child-led; she kinda became obsessed with the alphabet at 20 months, and had me read her alphabet book repeatedly. She'd point to letters everywhere, and have me tell her what they were. She lost interest around 23 months, and picked it back it around 25-26 months, where she quickly learned to say all the names, and loved (still loves!) to point out letters everywhere. Knows both upper and lower case, and rarely has had trouble with different fonts. A couple months ago she was interested in learning the letter sounds, so I started teaching her the SWR phonograms, using her books. She has the one letter ones down cold, now. She picked up her numbers, 1-10, about the same time as her letters, and in the same way. She loves to count things, and is getting close to developing one-to-one correspondence.
*I bought Greek and Hebrew alphabet books in January, and kinda "strewed" them about. She latched on to the Greek one, and it was her favorite for about a month or so. Picked it back up in April/May, along with the Hebrew one, and she has the Greek alphabet, with their sounds, down cold. She's familiar with the Hebrew alphabet - she could name quite a few out of order in another context - but hasn't wanted to learn their sounds yet.
I have the impression this is somewhat early for alphabet learning, especially given that it was largely child-led; I occasionally would introduce new things, so she'd know they existed, but never pushed it or sat her down for lessons or anything. But it's not like it is cognitively hard, or anything - just needs a good memory, which she has in spades. I think her memory is better than average, but have nothing to compare it with.
*Connection-wise, the big thing I've noticed is she manages to correctly identify things unaided and unprompted - animals, usually - that she learned in a completely different setting. She connected live animals in movies (without them being named) - elephants, zebras, etc. - with the cartoon animals in a book (badly drawn ones, at that). She connected Shrek the ogre with the ogres in World of Warcraft (and was upset with dh for killing them!). She connected the donkey Mary rode with Donkey in Shrek. Plus tons of others. She did this as soon as she could talk (25 months - most of what I related happened around then, or within a few months), and I think even before that, via pointing, but I can't remember specific incidents there. It seems impressive to me, but again, nothing to compare it with. (Actually, it is impressive to me, period, even if it is perfectly normal. I love it when she makes connections!)
Overall, she has loved books since he was little - turned pages well, in a paper book, at 10 months. She will give me a stack of books and have me read through them all, sometimes repeatedly. From the beginning, R was very observant, very persistent, and had a good attention span; A, at 7mo, is equally observant and persistent, with just as good an attention span (so I don't know if it is just how babies are or what, but a lot of people have commented about the observation thing), but is more easy-going than R.
So, what sayeth the Hive? (Or, more accurately, what sayeth the few brave souls who actually made it through this monstrosity of a post :tongue_smilie:)